Character of good research

Characteristics of Good head word Articles The following guidelines are taken from a series of editorial viewpoints In query Quarterly for Exercise In pastime authored by Dry. Maureen Weiss (1 993, 1994, 1995). You should consider these your bible for assessing articles you demonstrate and for writing rehunt proposals and eventu all in ally, manuscripts for publication. If you follow these guidelines you go forth become a better reader, writer, and referee of query 1. Introduction a. Is a metaphysical or conceptual rationale provided for the analyse? B. Is in that respect an adequate review and discussion of the pertinent empirical literature on the topic?Any key references omitted? C. Is at that place an explanation or justification for the filling of key variables in the bring? D. Is in that respect a logical progression and institution of ideas that lead to the purpose of the present ask? E. Do the hypotheses emanate logically from the surmise and research pres ented? F. Is It specified how the research question extends the current knowledge base In the research topic? 2. Method a. Is the consume expound thoroughly (age, gender, skill level, race, ethnicity) as well as the criteria for selection? B. Is the mark clearly stated and Is it appropriate to the search questions? be the germane(predicate) in strung-out and dependent variables clarified? C. be the measures described adequately (validity, reliability, item and scoring format)? D. Are the procedures described completely and clearly enough so that they could be replicated by others? E. Is a highway map provided for how the data are to be analyzed to address key study issues (e. G. , reliability of measures, each of the key research questions)? 3. Results a. Is the results section readable? B. Are subheadings befittingly used to enhance readability and the passage map? C.Are the appropriate statistics used to coiffe key study questions? D. Is all relevant Information associate d with a particular statistical procedure reported? E. Are the statistical findings Interpreted accurately? 4. Discussion a. Is the study purpose briefly recapped for the reader? B. Are the results summarized in relation to the study hypotheses (support, did non support)? C. Are the study results compared to pertinent studies mentioned in the introduction? D. Are theoretical implications provided? E. Are practical implications provided, if appropriate? F. Are prospective research directions outlined briefly? Is there a concluding paragraph that brings hitch to the article by ensuring that readers get the bring in message? 5. Other Issues a. Is the manuscript written clearly and understandably? B. Do all aspects of the manuscript conform to PAP modality?